Apart from innumerable benefits of Node.js development service, what are its shortcomings?

Node is actually a neat platform, and it has an attractive ecosystem. It has got one of the only package managers that actually work. It also drives on the acceptance of the JavaScript language, which provides it somewhat of a buildup status. However, there are limited points where it falls petite, even within the function that it was intended for.

Node.js development

Shortcomings of Node.js

  1. Bad concurrency primitives

The programming language is entirely built on top of the ground of asynchronous I/O. Being a single-threaded platform intensive on I/O bound applications on highest of a language that does not pledge transparency and has no support for co-routines, this is an explicable select. It is much superior than heavy weighted threads with shared states, but it is a poor model of concurrency to expose to the platform.

  1. It is Single – Threaded

Being single threaded, it means that one does not need to care about the problems of synchronizing between threads, or shared mutable state. However, it also means that unlike preemptive concurrency, the programmers themselves have to resolve how to pact with concurrency, with the avoidance being no concurrency at all.

  1. js lack maturity

Most of the core libraries are trustable, and you can trust them to usually do the right thing for Node.js development. But the ecosystem itself is still fairly mature. It is also difficult to access the quality of a precise module because of the deficiency of features for guaranteeing the eminence of code from JavaScript itself. The waynpm is so structured that it makes quite difficult to find trustable packages, and the ease of publishing your own package, together with the Unix-philosophy that goes through part of the community, make it tougher to spot packages that are reliable and verified.

  1. It is reliance on stringly-typed programming

There is a flourishing of “strings are easy” in the open, which hints to many bugs due to futile dependence on strings, rather than fitting data structures.

  1. It is hard for Node.js to make things fault-tolerant

They don’t give all of the tools that are necessary to make systems reliable and fault-tolerant, as OTP/Erlang does. There are no mechanisms to handle or recover from errors that are thrown asynchronously.

  1. js deficiency of intrinsic code organization is a giant disadvantage. It gets especially worsened when the development team as a whole isn’t accustomed with asynchronous programming or standard design outlines. There are just too many ways for code to get disruptive and unsustainable.
  2. js development service is wonderful, and has excellent chance of becoming the gold standard. But as concerned with the disadvantage, the Node API has a habit of changing in backwards-incompatible methods from release to release, and recurrent alterations to your codebase are obligatory to keep things running on the up-to-date version.
  3. Node’s biggest problem at the moment is the amount of duplication of effort taking place when it comes to the network of packages & the expanse of effort paid the best package to use for any agreed task that stems from this.

It really depends on what you’re trying to do with your web app. If you are doing a lot of I/O bound tasks then Node.js is just fine. However, if you find yourself doing a lot of CPU bound tasks than you are enhanced off using Java or whatever JVM language you desire because doing CPU bound tasks in Node.js will wedge the event loop.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s