There are number of Macbook available for Ruby on Rails Development Services. Macbook Pro is good; otherwise it would depend on your budget. If money is no problem, get the latest Macbook Pro, this is what the latest these days.
Macbook for Ruby on Rails Development Services
- By far the most important characteristic is RAM (below 8 GB is out of the question). Since they all come with a cool SSD HD second would probably be CPU. You can attach it to an external screen so you don’t have to get a huge screen and OS is not an issue since you can upgrade to the latest easily.
- Get the new Macbook Pro 15”. It has plenty of RAM that allows you to expand your dev environment with virtual machines.
- You can use Macbook Air 2014, HP 23-inch IPS LED Display, External Apple Keyboard and external mouse. And your work station is ready for the ROR development and any other stack as well.
- Any reasonable modern computer can run the Rails stack just fine. You could pick whichever the inexpensive or the one with the leading screen- screen space is always at a first-class. Biggest screen (Retina display if possible, the texts looks good), 4 to 8 GB RAM. Maybe a SSD and whichever macbooks fits will work great. Actually Rails will work great with most Mac Books.
- Though Macbooks makes a great laptop for web development, it really is not necessary. But still, if you would like to purchase, a preliminary model of a macbook pro would be more than enough for Ruby on Rails development as you barely use RAM eating software in Rails development. Memory will be necessary to be able to run multiple processes directly in memory.
- If price range is not an issue, you can go with Macbook Retina. Modern laptops. 2010 and up, will be ok to most Rails tasks. Retina will make an actual step up, with the flash disk and the incredible display. Try one at your neighboring mac shop or maybe with a friend. It is really a delight to write code on any editor of your and the disk speediness will be a huge difference in a lot of tasks, both dev and non-dev.For intensive tasks you need the i7 processor which in some cases you will encounter quite often.
Read More – Is the demand for Ruby on Rails Development Services showing decline?
Window is undoubtedly not a fit platform to develop Ruby on Rails applications. It lacks too many features, so, even moving to an entry level Macbook is always better than a PC. If money is not at all an issue, get a Macbook Pro Retina with i7 processor and 16 GB of RAM because Retina doesn’t tire your eyes. You will notice the difference between any other standard screen and a retina one, after a while using a retina display you will notice that you won’t be as eager as before to attach an external monitor unless is a retina monitor.
Java is perhaps overkill for small web projects. You can ponder directing your time on Ruby and Python, to learn Rails and Django, maybe. PHP is always handy. Java-based websites appears that their time to delivery is always slow as compared to what they could have done using a scripting language. Another factor to consider is that if you want to pick up work looking after prevailing sites, you will need to be able to handle with PHP, because so many trivial shabby sites that need your care will be PHP-based and regularly monitored by PHP Developers.
Java VS PHP for web design
- Java isn’t overkill if you are more familiar with it, but Ruby on Rails is trendy and it might be true about making sites quickly. You might want to get it a shot. PHP does come in handy every once in a while too. It is probably a good idea to keen on top of popular technology.
- Java and PHP are the two most-frequented languages. Your java experience won’t go to waste, for two main reasons:
- Probabilities are it will benefit you write decent, healthy PHP. PHP is every so often looked down upon because it makes it truly easy to write unconditionally untenable code. But if you are coming more from a more organized environment and you apply your current greatest practices to your PHP development, you will be acceptable.
- Having Java at the equipped will be treasured when you start taking on larger, more JSP/servlet- suitable projects down the road.
- If it is small scale, PHP developers will server your purpose very well. But is also right that it is good for you to take good code structure lessons from using big-boy OO languages like Java.
- Just from the hosting stand point, you will find a lot more places that offer PHP than most other languages, and knowing PHP is a good skill in case you get any work updating or maintain existing sites- a whole lot of the web runs on PHP. PHP is really easy to learn.
- PHP is dead simple. And almost fun to code in. Hosting with Java inclines to be a little more classy and elite, while everyone does PHP and protect Java for places that will host things from their very own servers. PHP is just calm to sit down and bang out a bunch of code in no time. Java and the others have a lot more overhead, and while that is fine if you are going to build something big.
- Smaller clients will want a lot for $ 1-3 k and won’t know enough about the tech to care. PHP will allow you to whip up whatever is needed, and will run on 99% of the shared webhosts out there. You can do your work in a framework that enforces some sort of MVC. Java is better for larger teams consisting of experienced developers working on larger projects.
You must keep working with what you know best. There is absolutely nothing mistaken with doing JSP/Servlet work, and in fact your effort might be more valued or valuable that way, since it is less common but very well-thought of. And never forget: 95% of the clients won’t care what languages you use or if you are a Java or a PHP developer; as long as you fulfill their requirement.
The demand for Ruby on rails development services is still very strong. It isn’t so much about Ruby not being in demand but about the number of people who have learnt Ruby. A number of people with stout back end or web application skills have found that somewhere they lack mobile development skills, which is where the key demand is, although most mobile projects require key skills in both front and back end. So essentially look to develop your mobile app talents, which you will use in combination with your Ruby skills.
Demand for ROR services
- Ruby on Rails is still one of the most lucrative good paying Platforms out there and there are still plenty of jobs available on oDesk and Elance.
- Why should that matter about demand? If you cave into your clients suggestions about know-how, you might as well let them code it themselves. They employ you to convey value. The mainstream of that value is in creating technical decisions.
- If somebody asks you to build a product, but you can only use Django or Node or whatever is hot at the minute, it’s your profession to instruct them and take the burden off making such decisions. It is not hard to influence serviceable people they are better off thinking about the business and to leave the technology to you.
- Anyone who says the selection of technology used to build a product had a main impression on that product’s achievement / letdown is talking no right. For this reason, as an outworker, the demand for a given technology means squat to your lowest line if you emphasis on the value you carry.
- The demand is at an all-time high for “really good” developers, the ones that care about code and that writes elegant, sustainable, maintainable code, that understands big pictures and project management sufficient, that can execute devops errands and that are constantly self-teaching the whole new tech.
Many of the applications and software platforms are in low demand. No one wants a programmer that just complains; refuses to learn new stuff, messes up and do unmaintainable code. The variation in demand depends on certain factors including the place and features. There are plenty of jobs available for Ruby on Rails developers to continue and avail better pay for that. It all depends on how you are going to take the things, the cost, the criteria, the modification and code learning. Improvement in technology has provided the boon so as the developer can benefit a lot from RoR services.
Each framework has its own features. The framework that you consider the easiest to set up and use might not be the best fit for any other particular task. It would depend on what you want to do, drop dead easy or Blogfile. You can try any of them and it would appear as full-fledged competitor to conventional framework but just another alternative in the Python development services environment.
The easiest Python web framework
- From ‘getting started’ to documentation point of view, both web2py and Flask are outstanding that sets them apart from the rest. Web2py is just simple to install by just unpacking the zip file and running it. Clear MVC structure makes it very easy to build apps as the community is quite friendly.
- For simple projects and testing ideas, webpy is just great. It is really more like a library than an entire framework. It is very easy, simple to understand and a good way to learn about RESTful design principles. You can reliably set up and coding in less than 5 minutes. It is thus great for beginners as well as experienced users.
- Django is also one of the best frameworks for use. The built-in admin site is very useful while dealing with objects and with many batteries included. For beginner Django documentation is the best. After doing a few tutorials and not being impatient, it would click for the beginners and start making sense.
- Tornado is a great asynchronous web server and a framework including a template engine. It is easy to develop quickly and set up web apps. Sharknado is just another option, and it is simple but powerful to build even a basic real-time chat in less than 200 lines of code.
- You may also try Google app-engine, the Google cloud computing platform. It is fairly straightforward to get your web application hosted without even spending a single cent on hosting.
Read More – What is the best Python Web Framework that runs on Google App engine and on dedicated servers?
For absolute beginners, you may try a few of them and judge the best for yourself. Choosing the framework also depends on the project you have in mind, but I assure you will learn a lot if you make a small project in at least 3 or 4 of the frameworks mentioned.
There are number of Python web frameworks available for python development Services. Before selecting any one of them, you should check how well the framework is supporting and assisting with the change, the data model and evolving the underlying database schema. Time may come when an extension will force you to make changes to your data schema and perform migration.
Web framework that runs on Google Appengine and on dedicated servers
- Pyramid is just awesome to use. It is an easy-to-use MVC framework that does not impose any specific ORM or a templating engine. You are very much free to use what works best for you. Pyramid has a set of functions for using it with Google App Engine.
- Web2py is considered the best python framework and it is too easy to get going on App Engine out of the box, and will also be completely portable to other platforms with minimal to no changes. It is a well-integrated full-stack framework that is very easy to learn and use.
- Many users opt for Tornado. It is because of its light weight and fast performance, especially on cold start, which is an app engine issue for low-traffic apps. It is even faster than webapp because webapp loads the Django templating system. For your dedicated server you can move on to stock which is “non-relational” for GAE as well as MongoDB. You can actually share 95% of the code.
- By using AppScale, you can use whichever framework you love in GAE and have it port over to dedicated servers without modifications to your application.
- The main problem is that, the data store offered by GAE is not the same but is quite unlike from even other NoSQL favors. It actually may not make the best way to port such apps out of the GAE if an app is designed for GAE.
- For Django and webpy, they actually offer SQL structure to allow accessing of the data store. However when talking in terms of completeness, web2py “data abstraction layer” support not only GAE’s data store, but also other NoSQL databases, which could be the expectation for forking out of the data store.
Read More – What are the advantages and disadvantages of Google App Engine against Amazon EC2 or Microsoft Azure?
There are list of web framework that run on Google App Engine and on dedicated server mentioned above. Each of them has their own features and importance that makes users select them for any specific purpose. Web2py and Django are more widely in use when compared to any other web framework.
The advantages of App Engines are fairly well known. Some of them include seamless scalability, simple APIs to backend datastores, mail auth and asynch task queues. However, if you try to build anything substantial on top of App Engine, you are bound to run into a few operational pitfalls as well. Azure Application Development Services offers many features but GAP is no more less. Both of have has their own pros and cons.
Google App Engine VS Microsoft Azure
Advantages of GAE
- The main advantage of GAE is it doesn’t scale. However, even after you empower billing, the whole system is augmented to support only 500 requests per second. If you want more, you can reach Google’s disposal to increase your thresholds, so you can have millions of users, but more than 500 requests per second. If you want to do more than 500 requests and your app is legit, they will remove those caps or make them higher.
- GAE feature set is good enough to build a decent website and you don’t need to do the maintenance work.
- It doesn’t require any server administration. It has free usage quotas and provides scalability. GAE has better access to Google user accounts and deployment process is very easy.
- GAE has the highest admin load. Once you are set up, deploying and re-deploying is quick and they will auto-everything. For example, you don’t have to worry about the number of servers your app is using, how to share the data and how to load-balance.
- You can get any feature from the store with GAE. But with Azure, you get the feeling of SQL Azure database but at the same time it would be too expensive. Azure storage is likely to have more gotchas. No relational integrity, no order-by, you will scam with the in-memory setting more. GAE’s store has far rarer margins and more features than Azure tables.
Disadvantages of GAE
- GAE is yet not stable enough. Even Google says that GAE is the same infrastructure of Google self-internal project. And the budget would increase much when your website becomes bulky.
- Without native file system read/write access, it is hard to process some data transform with existing library, and it doesn’t support some native file system base library as well.
- It does not provide full text search API. Also, the SDK/Java is unfavorable with Maven, it is unsatisfactory to accomplish lots of external libraries. The SDK/Java depth rest on on IDE, and the default project directory structure is some difference with normal web app.
- It is not easy to process unit test. It cannot fix the root cause and does not support add SSL to web site. The GAE may be the development for future web application, but it is not equipped for building a modern web site now.
- It suffers from the inability to tweak server software. The Filesystem and many standard library modules are inaccessible. Only Python and a few runs of Java Virtual machine.
GAE has great UI that includes a record viewer and a data editor. With Azure, you have to catch external viewers/editors for this. Also, GAE lets you have several sorts of your application running on the same data store. You can deploy, test a variety and then set the current ‘live’ version when you are prepared. You can change back anytime if something goes wrong.
There is never an end from learning new languages. You can continue learning multiple languages so as to develop more coding and programming skills in multiple fields. That desire to learn new languages, technologies, and paradigms is what bring users to Ruby and Rails. Learn it because it is different and interesting. Ruby on Rails application development services has variety of tools for building healthy coding and software development.
Learning Ruby along with ASP.Net
- Ruby appears to be simpler and a quicker way to get things done. Once familiar with it and having command of a language like Ruby allows you to write quick scripts or utilities that otherwise might require a bit of ceremony in .Net.
- If you are considering to move to Rails, that is a dissimilar standard. The event driven nature of .Net is definitely in stark contrast to Rails’ interpretation of REST and its response / request model. Knowing both patterns would actually make you a better web developer.
- Also, there is something to be said for being a polyglot programmer. Knowing the tradeoffs of different stacks and languages would make you a more effective problem solver. Ruby on Rails Development Services offer multiple tool for working with different sets of situations. Multiple skills would surely add more knowledge and that can help you anytime in the future.
- The problem with single methodology is that, you get used to a single stack that is by far the least used in the web in general and you miss several important technologies in the present date.
- The biggest advantage on being in the Ruby Community is the difference in attitude towards new stuff, a stark contrast to being dependent on the mother ship. The goal is not just to learn a tool called Ruby on Rails, but to open yourself to a larger set of possibilities, including using Java and even more ‘exotic’ stuff such as Erlang. The Microsoft stack is just too limited and the attitude is to isolate you in this limited set when there is so much more to explore.
- In practice, everyday developer should always be learning “something”. The fact that you are even qualifying yourself as an “ASP.Net” developer means that you are missing something. Why not an ASP.Net developer is a Ruby developer? Are you incapable of writing other services or console apps? Are you not able to write web services or public- facing API endpoints?
So, it is definitely better to learn something different when you already have a good command over ASP.Net. In this case, Python / Django, Ruby / Rails, or JS / Node JS would be different enough for it to be a positive experience, regardless of whether you permanently switch to the one you have learned. It is really important to collect multiple skills rather than staying constant with just one skill. It is not just in the case of Ruby, but all you need to understand is you should be learning something.